Do innovation, financial development and institutional quality matter in managing carbon risk?

Peer Reviewed
18 December 2023

Francis Atsu, Samuel Adams

Using territorial- and consumption-based carbon emissions as proxies for carbon risk, the study examined the impact of innovation on carbon risk while controlling for institutional quality and financial development effects in the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) from 1986 to 2021. To address cross-sectional dependence and ensure robustness, we employed the augmented mean group (AMG) and cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lags (CS-ARDL) estimation techniques. Our findings show that innovation plays a key role in mitigating carbon risks, with a more pronounced effect on territorial carbon risk compared to consumption-based carbon risk. Furthermore, financial development exerts a positive influence on carbon risk, especially in the context of consumption-based emissions. Notably, institutional quality mitigates both forms of carbon risk. These outcomes suggest that BRICS countries should consider the types of carbon risk when formulating carbon emissions mitigation strategies.

EfD Authors

Files and links

Country
Sustainable Development Goals
Publication reference
Atsu, F., & Adams, S. (2023). Do innovation, financial development and institutional quality matter in managing carbon risk? Sustainable Environment, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2023.2293214
Publication | 26 January 2024