We study distributional preferences in adolescent peer networks. Using incentivized choices between allocations for themselves and a passive agent, children are classiﬁed into efficiency-loving, inequality-loving, inequality-averse, and spiteful types. We ﬁnd that pairs of students who report a friendship link are more likely to exhibit the same preference type than other students who attend the same school. The relation between types is almost completely driven by inequality-loving and spiteful types. The role of peer networks in explaining distributional preferences goes beyond network composition effects. A low rank in academic performance and a central position within the network relate positively to a higher likelihood of being classiﬁed as spiteful. Hence, social hierarchies seem to be correlated with distributional preference types.