Skip to main content

Error message

Please set which field you are using for counting results in the tagadelic display.

2016-12-28 | Peer Reviewed

Allocatinggroup-levelpayments for ecosystem services: Experiences from a REDD+ pilot in Tanzania

Robinson, Elizabeth J Z, Heidi J. Albers, Razack Lokina and Charles Meshack. 2016. “Allocatinggroup-levelpayments for ecosystem services: Experiences from a REDD+ pilot in Tanzania .” Resources 5:4: .
Download reference Doi:10.3390/resources5040043

Payments for ecosystem services (PES) typically reward landowners for managing their land to provide ecosystem services that would not otherwise be provided. REDD+—Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation—is a form of PES aimed at decreasing carbon emissions from forest conversion and extraction in lower-income countries. A key challenge for REDD+ occurs when it is implemented at a group, rather than an individual landowner, level. Whilst achieving a group-level reduction relies on individuals changing their interaction with the forest, incentives are not aligned explicitly at the individual level. Rather, payments are made to a defined group as a single entity in exchange for verified reduced forest loss, as per a PES scheme. In this paper, we explore how REDD+ has been implemented in one multiple-village pilot in Tanzania with the village defining the group. Our findings suggest that considerable attention has been paid towards monitoring, reporting, verification (MRV), and equity. No explicit mechanism ensures individual compliance with the village-level PES, and few villages allocate funds for explicit enforcement efforts to protect the forest from illegal activities undertaken by individual group members or by outsiders. However, the development of village-level institutions, “social fencing,” and a shared future through equal REDD+ payments, factor into decisions that influence the level of compliance at the village level that the program will eventually achieve