Trade, GMOs, and Environmental Risk: Are Policies Likely to Improve Welfare?
Controversy over the EU import ban on food from genetically modified organisms (GMOs) forced the EU to change course and institute a mandatory labeling scheme. This study first examined how different policies for the production and use of GMOs might influence the market outcome in consumer food markets. Second, it evaluated the welfare effects of the policy measures, finding that mandatory labeling often increases both domestic welfare and global welfare, while trade bans more likely decrease global welfare.
Files
- Link to pdf 323.3 kB
Centers
- eeu sweden
Type of publication
- EfD Discussion paper
Reference
Håkan Eggert, and Mads Greaker, ”Trade, GMOs, and Environmental Risk: Are Policies Likely to Improve Welfare?”, EfD Discussion Paper 08-19, a joint publication of the Environment for Development Initiative and Resources for the Future (www.rff.org), Washington DC. August 2008.Publications
- Peer reviewed
- EfD Discussion papers
- Discussion papers
- Policy briefs
- EfD/RFF Books
- Books
- Reports
- Research Briefs
- Other
- Theses PhD & MSc
- All Publications
EfD Newsletter
Subscribe to our Newsletter service
Join or share
See Also
Setting Priorities, Targeting Subsidies among Water, Sanitation, and Preventive Health [...]
This paper challenges the conventional wisdom that water and sanitation improvements and other [cont...]
Climate Policy, Uncertainty, and the Role of Technological Innovation
We study how uncertainty about climate change severity affects the relative benefits of early [cont...]
