eeu sweden | Climate change Policy design

Is fairness blind?—The effect of framing on preferences for effort-sharing rules

This paper uses a choice experiment to study citizens' preferences for effort-sharing rules for reducing carbon dioxide emissions. For a given global cost and level of emission reduction, we study the willingness to pay for various rules that imply different distributions of the cost between EU, the US, China and Africa.

The focus of this paper is on the use of two different treatments, one where the respondents were informed about the country (or country group) names and one where the names were replaced with anonymous labels A–D. This allows us to test whether people's preferences for effort-sharing rules depend on the framing of the problem. We find that the ranking of the rules and the strength of the preferences are not significantly different between the two treatments, and hence we find no evidence of ingroup bias in preferences for effort-sharing rules.

EfD Authors

Keywords

Links

Centers

  • eeu sweden

Type of publication

  • COMMONS
  • Peer reviewed

Reference

Fredrik Carlsson, Mitesh Kataria, Elina Lampia, Åsa Löfgren, and Thomas Sterner, 2011, "Is fairness blind?—The effect of framing on preferences for effort-sharing rules", Accepted for publication in Ecological Economics.

Publications

EfD Newsletter

Subscribe to our Newsletter service

Join or share



Follow EfD on Twitter
Join EfD on LinkedInJoin EfD on LinkedIn

See Also

How African Agriculture Can Adapt to Climate Change? A Counterfactual Analysis from Ethiopia

We analyze and compare the impact of different adaptation strategies on crop net revenues in the [cont...]

Setting Priorities, Targeting Subsidies among Water, Sanitation, and Preventive Health [...]

This paper challenges the conventional wisdom that water and sanitation improvements and other [cont...]