Comments on Simon Dietz and Nicholas Stern's Why Economic Analysis Supports Strong Action on Climate Change: A Response to the Stern Review's Critics
When the Stern Review challenged the conventional wisdom and called for strong and immediate action on climate change, reactions were initially fierce. However, the ensuing debate has shown a new consensus in the making.
This article contains three contributions to this discussion posted by: Robert Mendelsohn, Thomas Sterner and U. Martin Persson, and John P. Weyant.
Files
- Link to pdf 65.4 kB
Centers
- eeu sweden
Type of publication
- Peer reviewed
Reference
Mendelsohn R, T Sterner, M Persson and J P Weyant, “Comments on Simon Dietz and Nicholas Stern's Why Economic Analysis Supports Strong Action on Climate Change: A Response to the Stern Review's Critics”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Vol 2:2 pp 309-313Publications
- Peer reviewed
- EfD Discussion papers
- Discussion papers
- Policy briefs
- EfD/RFF Books
- Books
- Reports
- Other
- Theses PhD & MSc
- All Publications
EfD Newsletter
Subscribe to our Newsletter service
Join or share
Join EfD on LinkedIn
See Also
Paul J. Ferraro to EfD-Central America Center at CATIE, Costa Rica
Ferraro is a Fulbright Scholar (2011-2012) and will be working at EfD-CA as guest researcher from [cont...]
The role safety nets as part of adaptation strategies to climate change in Central America
Studying collective responses to extreme climatic events is fundamental in the design of adaptation [cont...]
