Comments on Simon Dietz and Nicholas Stern's Why Economic Analysis Supports Strong Action on Climate Change: A Response to the Stern Review's Critics
When the Stern Review challenged the conventional wisdom and called for strong and immediate action on climate change, reactions were initially fierce. However, the ensuing debate has shown a new consensus in the making.
This article contains three contributions to this discussion posted by: Robert Mendelsohn, Thomas Sterner and U. Martin Persson, and John P. Weyant.
Files
- Link to pdf 65.4 kB
Centers
- eeu sweden
Type of publication
- Peer reviewed
Reference
Mendelsohn R, T Sterner, M Persson and J P Weyant, “Comments on Simon Dietz and Nicholas Stern's Why Economic Analysis Supports Strong Action on Climate Change: A Response to the Stern Review's Critics”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Vol 2:2 pp 309-313Publications
- Peer reviewed
- Discussion papers
- EfD Discussion papers
- Policy briefs
- EfD/RFF Books
- Books
- Reports
- Other
- Theses Phd & MSc
- All Publications
See Also
Climate Change and Total Factor Productivity in the Tanzanian Economy: A Computable General [...]
The paper analyses the economic impacts of climate change-induced adjustments on the performance of [cont...]
Paying for Mitigation: A Multiple Country Study
Unique survey data from a contingent valuation study conducted in three different countries (China, [cont...]
