Comments on Simon Dietz and Nicholas Stern's Why Economic Analysis Supports Strong Action on Climate Change: A Response to the Stern Review's Critics
When the Stern Review challenged the conventional wisdom and called for strong and immediate action on climate change, reactions were initially fierce. However, the ensuing debate has shown a new consensus in the making.
This article contains three contributions to this discussion posted by: Robert Mendelsohn, Thomas Sterner and U. Martin Persson, and John P. Weyant.
Files
- Link to pdf 65.4 kB
Centers
- eeu sweden
Type of publication
- Peer reviewed
Reference
Mendelsohn R, T Sterner, M Persson and J P Weyant, “Comments on Simon Dietz and Nicholas Stern's Why Economic Analysis Supports Strong Action on Climate Change: A Response to the Stern Review's Critics”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Vol 2:2 pp 309-313Publications
- Peer reviewed
- Discussion papers
- EfD Discussion papers
- Policy briefs
- EfD/RFF Books
- Books
- Reports
- Other
- Theses Phd & MSc
- All Publications
See Also
SEMINARIO: Consecuencias de Copenhague: ¿Cuáles son los retos y las oportunidades?
Un enfoque actualizado de las negociaciones internacionales en cambio climático
Bio-economics of Conservation Agriculture and Soil Carbon Sequestration in Developing Countries
Improvement in soil carbon through conservation agriculture in developing countries may generate [cont...]
