Are Agricultural Extension Packages What Ethiopian Farmers Want? A Stated Preference Analysis
This paper reports the results of a stated preference survey in the highlands of Ethiopia where the farmers are given a choice between an agricultural extension package and a local public - representing two major developing strategies. The study finds that a majority of people prefers the public good.
However, when the extension package is combined with insurance, then we find a significant increase in the choice of the extension package. The study thus sheds light on why Ethiopia's major development strategy has had limited success and gives evidence of how stated preference methodologies can be utilized for development policy design.
- Link to PDF 102.7 kB
- eeu sweden
Type of publication
- Discussion paper
ReferenceCarlsson, F., G. Köhlin, A. Mekonnen, and M. Yesuf. 2005. "Are agricultural extension packages really what Ethiopian farmers want? A stated preference analysis". Working Papers in Economics No. 172, Department of Economics, Göteborg University.
- Peer reviewed
- EfD Discussion papers
- Discussion papers
- Policy briefs
- EfD/RFF Books
- Research Briefs
- Theses PhD & MSc
- All Publications
Subscribe to our Newsletter service
Join or share
Using individual travel diary data collected before and after the rail transit coverage expansion [cont...]
The lack of cooperation and prevalence of free riding in efforts to reduce emissions reflects the [cont...]